<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; TEEB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visionarc.org/archives/tag/teeb/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visionarc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 14:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Mare Liberum (&#8216;Free Seas&#8217;)</title>
		<link>http://visionarc.org/archives/437</link>
		<comments>http://visionarc.org/archives/437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VisionArc]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free seas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEEB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visionarc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionarc.org/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, VisionArc reported on a current United Nations research initiative to develop a set of quantitative and evaluative tools to measure the economic and external values embodied within ecosystems. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) is part of a growing conceptual and global policy shift towards more rigorous, coordinated and quantitative standards for ecosystem [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/10_0719_POST_1.jpg" alt="10_0719_POST_1" width="800" height="600" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1473" /><br />
Recently, VisionArc <strong><a href="http://visionarc.org/archives/209">reported</a></strong> on a current United Nations research initiative to develop a set of quantitative and evaluative tools to measure the economic and external values embodied within ecosystems.  <strong><a href="http://www.teebweb.org/Home/tabid/924/language/en-US/Default.aspx">The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity</a></strong> (TEEB) is part of a growing conceptual and global policy shift towards more rigorous, coordinated and quantitative standards for <strong><a href="http://www.unep.org/ecosystemmanagement/">ecosystem management</a></strong>. </p>
<p>Contributing to this shift, <strong><a href="http://www.conservation.org/Pages/default.aspx">Conservation International</a></strong>, National Geographic and The New England Aquarium have announced a collaboration to determine the feasibility of a so-called global <em>Oceans Health Index</em>.  Conservation International <strong><a href="http://www.conservation.org/sites/marine/initiatives/ocean_health_index/pages/ocean_health_index.aspx">reports</a></strong> that the purpose of the Index is to build a “scientifically solid and globally respected Ocean Health Index that reveals variations and trends in ocean health [and will] consolidate public, political, and corporate commitment to improve ocean health in places where it is poor or in decline.” </p>
<p>In the past, efforts to develop policies and strategies that address ocean health have been hindered by the ability of experts and policymakers to agree on a common metric for oceans health.  This difficulty has been further exacerbated by one of scale too.  ‘High seas’ territory, or <em>mare liberum</em>- Latin for <em>free seas</em>- accounts for 60% of the planets oceans- or about 83.4 million square miles of unregulated and mostly unprotected territory.  This has encouraged a growing number of blind spots.</p>
<p>At present, only .5% of the world’s oceans are under some form or environmental protection, while terrestrial ecosystems come in at about 12%.  Furthermore, U.S. federal space research investment in 2004 was more than 6 times that which was invested in oceans research (NASA/NCSE).  This is despite the fact that in the same year the world’s oceans provided over 100 million tones of fish according to the <strong><a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0250e/i0250e00.htm">Food and Agriculture Organization</a></strong>.  Needless to say, a NASA food program has yet to be discussed.  </p>
<p>Such disparities no doubt reflect different forms of valuation.  Like the <strong><a href="http://www.teebweb.org/Home/tabid/924/language/en-US/Default.aspx">TEEB</a></strong> report, the challenge for an Ocean Health Index will be in developing not only a measurable system to quantify values, but also a flexible system to promote them in vastly different environmental and economic contexts.  The flexibility here will be how effective such a system is at bridging between these different contexts in order to design a much needed- yet thus far little understood- definition of global commons governance for the world’s oceans and marine eco-services.</p>
<p>Conservation International and its partners have established a steering committee and will be developing a plan to publicly launch the Ocean Health Index on World Ocean’s Day on June 8, 2011.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://visionarc.org/archives/437/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
