<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Center for Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visionarc.org/archives/tag/center-for-architecture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visionarc.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 14:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>04.12: Re:Think Design Outputs</title>
		<link>http://visionarc.org/archives/818</link>
		<comments>http://visionarc.org/archives/818#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VisionArc]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landon brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visionarc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionarc.org/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 12, VisionArc participated in a panel discussion organized by the AIANYC New Practices Committee. The event, entitled Re:Think, Design Thinking Outputs was held at the Center for Architecture and brought together individuals from various design Think-Tank groups to reflect on the following statement: &#8220;Over the past two decades the prevalence of the design [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="flexslider">
            <ul class="slides"><li><a href="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_1.jpg" title="12_0419_POST_1"><img width="800" height="600" src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_1.jpg" class="attachment-large" alt="12_0419_POST_1" /></a></li><li><a href="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_4.jpg" title="12_0419_POST_4"><img width="800" height="600" src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_4.jpg" class="attachment-large" alt="12_0419_POST_4" /></a></li><li><a href="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_2.jpg" title="12_0419_POST_2"><img width="800" height="600" src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_2.jpg" class="attachment-large" alt="12_0419_POST_2" /></a></li><li><a href="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_3.jpg" title="12_0419_POST_3"><img width="800" height="600" src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0419_POST_3.jpg" class="attachment-large" alt="12_0419_POST_3" /></a></li></ul></div><br />
On April 12, VisionArc participated in a panel discussion organized by the AIANYC New Practices Committee.  The event, entitled <em>Re:Think, Design Thinking Outputs</em> was held at the <strong><a href="http://cfa.aiany.org/index.php?section=center-for-architecture" target="_blank">Center for Architecture</a></strong> and brought together individuals from various design Think-Tank groups to reflect on the following statement:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Over the past two decades the prevalence of the design practice as &#8216;Think-Tank&#8217; has become an increasingly common model. Whether this approach is born out of survivalism amid economic crisis or it is a more intentional shift on the part of designers to generate agency in the world as &#8216;thinkers&#8217; not just &#8216;makers&#8217;, it is clear that the current generation of design practices face an imperative to organize in ways that allow them to address broader issues through a range of outlets including media, technology, visual art, journalism, branding, and politics. For disciplines like architecture, what appears to be at stake is the need to cultivate a more pro-active engagement beyond the immediate boundaries of the profession in order to drive decision making and maintain relevance. If it is true that the traditional practice of building is simply &#8216;too slow&#8217; to keep up with the pace of change in private enterprise, then how has the design Think-Tank model increased the agility of designers in the marketplace? What are the direct results and residual effects of these strategies? How are design thinking and research methodologies evolving?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>For our part, VisionArc discussed our involvement in a 2011 energy monitoring and conservation <strong><a href="http://visionarc.org/archives/697" target="_blank">initiative</a></strong> that was launched in the immediate aftermate of the March 11th tsunami and earthquake in Japan.  This was discussed along with our ongoing work studying the design of <strong><a href="http://visionarc.org/archives/762" target="_blank">urban resources</a></strong> and strategies for risk response in cities ranging from New York to Helsinki to Tokyo.</p>
<p>The roundtable discussion was guided by moderator and partner of <strong><a href="http://leong-leong.com/" title="Leong Leong Architecture" target="_blank">Leong Leong Architecture</a></strong>, Christopher Leong.  Other panelists included Troy Therrien, Partner at Th-ey and Curator at <strong><a href="http://experimentsinmotion.com/">Experiments in Motion</a></strong>, Columbia University, New York; Adam Greenfield, Founder of <strong><a href="http://urbanscale.org/">Urbanscale</a></strong>; Ken Farmer, <strong><a href="http://dotankbrooklyn.org/">DoTank Brooklyn</a></strong>; Georgeen Theodore, Partner at <strong><a href="http://www.interboropartners.net/">Interboro Partners</a></strong>; and David Benjamin, Principal at <strong><a href="http://www.thelivingnewyork.com/">The Living</a></strong>.</p>
<p>A video of the discussion can be seen <strong><a href="http://vimeo.com/41152962" target="_blank">here</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://visionarc.org/archives/818/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>03.23: &#8216;Freeboard&#8217; Design Charrette</title>
		<link>http://visionarc.org/archives/811</link>
		<comments>http://visionarc.org/archives/811#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VisionArc]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landon brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiko mori architect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visionarc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visionarc.org/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 23rd, VisionArc director Landon Brown contributed to the &#8216;Freeboard&#8217; design charrette sponsored by the New York City Department of City Planning; AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee. The day-long event took place at the AIA New York City Center for Architecture. Published in Reports from the Field on March 28th, 2012 Reporting [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://visionarc.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/12_0402_POST.jpg" alt="12_0402_POST" width="800" height="600" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1386" /><br />
On March 23rd, VisionArc director Landon Brown contributed to the &#8216;Freeboard&#8217; design charrette sponsored by the New York City Department of City Planning; AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee.  The day-long event took place at the AIA New York City Center for Architecture.   </p>
<p><em>Published in Reports from the Field on March 28th, 2012<br />
Reporting by Benedict Clouette, writer and the editor of e-Oculus.</em></p>
<p>Recognizing the need for fresh ideas to address these new risks to the city, a recent design charrette at the Center for Architecture brought together more than 50 architects, urban designers, landscape architects, planners, and educators to develop creative responses to the challenges posed by rising water levels and increasingly unpredictable weather patterns. The event, a joint project of the New York City Department of City Planning and the AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee, called on designers to propose strategies to improve the city’s flood-resistance while also maintaining the vitality of New York’s streets.</p>
<p>The charrette’s participants were divided into groups, each addressing a different building typology (single-family homes, elevator apartments, mixed-use buildings, and multi-family row-houses), and were charged with producing solutions for similar buildings sited in low-lying and flood-prone areas. The brief asked that the designs respond to the anticipated water elevation levels of a 100-year flood, and prompted the teams to keep in mind the pedestrian experience of the street.</p>
<p>During the charrette, the participants crowded around tables, sketching their ideas over typical sections and elevations of their building types. Many of the teams produced several possible schemes, reflecting different trade-offs and priorities, all of which were discussed in a round of presentations at the conclusion of the charrette.</p>
<p>“The design charrette was a creative, collaborative, and dynamic step in addressing the risks that we confront as we move into the 21st century,” said Lance Jay Brown, FAIA, co-chair of the Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee and an organizer of the event. “These members of the New York design community stepped up, voluntarily and on short notice, and donated their time, energy, and creativity in pursuit of inventive solutions.”</p>
<p>The afternoon ended with a call to continue to refine the ideas generated at the event, and the suggestion of future workshops to address a greater range of scales, moving from the building to the city and the region. The Department of City Planning is expected to issue a report summarizing the findings of the charrette this summer.</p>
<p>Other participants included:<br />
Participants: David Piscuskas, FAIA, 1100 Architect; Richard Dattner, FAIA, Dattner Architects; Deborah Gans, AIA, Gans Studio; Lee Weintraub, FASLA, Lee Weintraub Landscape Architecture; Pablo Vengoechea, Pablo Vengoechea Architect; Mary Kimball, NYC Department of City Planning; Vincent Linarello, Alexander Gorlin Architects; Anne-Sophie Hall, AIA, Grimshaw Architects; Chris Garvin, AIA, Terrapin Bright Green; Julia Murphy, AIA, Skidmore, Owings &#038; Merrill; Wids Delacour, AIA, Delacour &#038; Ferrara Architects; Erick Gregory, NYC Department of City Planning; Jill Lerner, FAIA, Kohn Pedersen Fox; Basar Girit, Situ Studio; Bill Browning, Terrapin Bright Green; Maria Milans del Bosch, Mathhew Baird Architects; Denisha Williams, ASLA, Denisha Williams Landscape; Jeff Schumaker, NYC Department of City Planning; Beth Greenberg, AIA, Dattner Architects; Reid Freeman, AIA, James Carpenter Design; Eric Bunge, AIA, nArchitects; Carmi Bee, FAIA, RKTB; Allison Duncan, ASLA, Allison Duncan Design; Skye Duncan, NYC Department of City Planning; Peter Gluck, Peter Gluck &#038; Partners; Jonathan Marvel, AIA, Rogers Marvel; Stephen Cassell, AIA, Architecture Research Office (ARO); Florence Schmitt, Matthew Baird Architects; Chris Holme, NYC Department of City Planning; Hayes Slade, AIA, Slade Architects; Marc Puig, nArchitects; Lisa Tsang, Obra Architects; Jamie Chan, NYC Department of City Planning; Leah Cohen, NYC Department of City Planning; Frank Michielli, AIA, Michielli + Wyetzner; Colin Cathcart, AIA, Kiss Cathcart; Matthew Berman, Assoc. AIA, workshop/apd; Claire Weisz, AIA, WXY architecture + urban design; Susannah Drake, AIA, ASLA, dlandstudio; Jessica Fain, NYC Department of City Planning; Michelle Valdez, NYC Department of City Planning; Pablo Castro, AIA, Obra Architects; James Slade, AIA, Slade Architects; Winka Dubbledam, Assoc. AIA, Archi-tectonics; Michael Kwartler, FAIA, Environmental Simulation Center; Tricia Martin, LEED AP, WE Design; Michael Marrella, NYC Department of City Planning; Colin Gardener, NYC Department of City Planning; Illya Azaroff, AIA, Co-chair, Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee; Lance Jay Brown, FAIA, Co-chair, Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://visionarc.org/archives/811/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
